improve documentation of consumer polling behaviour
I added some additional information, which I got from this discussion to avoid confusion for others: #5673
This commit is contained in:
parent
607adf44f3
commit
292ebdbc3a
@ -1050,8 +1050,10 @@ system changes with `inotify`.
|
||||
|
||||
#### [`PAPERLESS_CONSUMER_POLLING_RETRY_COUNT=<num>`](#PAPERLESS_CONSUMER_POLLING_RETRY_COUNT) {#PAPERLESS_CONSUMER_POLLING_RETRY_COUNT}
|
||||
|
||||
: If consumer polling is enabled, sets the number of times paperless
|
||||
will check for a file to remain unmodified.
|
||||
: If consumer polling is enabled, sets the maximum number of times
|
||||
paperless will check for a file to remain unmodified. If a file's
|
||||
modification time and size are identical for two consecutive checks, it
|
||||
will be consumed.
|
||||
|
||||
Defaults to 5.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user