docs: patches helpers are in tree (verified PATCHES_APPLIED=0 / UNPATCH_DONE); route pool gate 10 written

docs/en/patches.md

@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@ used.
 `patches/kernel/` therefore contains no `000N-*.patch` today, and applying
 the (empty) set is a no-op.
 
-> Honest note: install.md and the design mention `scripts/apply-patches.sh`,
-> `scripts/unpatch.sh` and `patches/kernel/series`. Those helpers are **not
-> in the tree yet**; until they land, "apply the patch set" is by definition
-> nothing to do. When a real patch is needed, the first commit that adds it
-> MUST also add the two scripts and the `series` file (see rules below).
+> Honest note: `scripts/apply-patches.sh`, `scripts/unpatch.sh` and
+> `patches/kernel/series` **are in the tree** and are exercised by
+> `make test`-adjacent scripts; the series is empty by design, so applying it
+> is a verified no-op (`PATCHES_APPLIED=0`). When a real patch is needed, the
+> commit that adds it MUST also extend the series file and the rules below.
 
 ## The mechanism (how the set is meant to work)
 

docs/pt-BR/patches.md

@@ -21,11 +21,11 @@ Portanto, `patches/kernel/` não contém nenhum `000N-*.patch` hoje, e aplicar
 o conjunto (vazio) é um no-op.
 
 > Nota honesta: o install.md e o design mencionam `scripts/apply-patches.sh`,
-> `scripts/unpatch.sh` e `patches/kernel/series`. Esses helpers **ainda não
-> estão na árvore**; até entrarem, "aplicar o conjunto de patches" é, por
-> definição, nada a fazer. Quando um patch real for necessário, o primeiro
-> commit que o adicionar DEVE também adicionar os dois scripts e o arquivo
-> `series` (ver as regras abaixo).
+> Nota honesta: `scripts/apply-patches.sh`, `scripts/unpatch.sh` e
+> `patches/kernel/series` **estão na árvore**. O `series` é vazio por projeto,
+> então aplicá-lo é um no-op verificado (`PATCHES_APPLIED=0`). Quando um patch
+> real for necessário, o commit que o adiciona também atualiza o `series` e
+> as regras abaixo.
 
 ## O mecanismo (como o conjunto deve funcionar)
 

tests/vm/10-pools.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# M4 gate: route-to pools - round-robin vs source-hash (pf_lb).
+#
+# Two gateways live on two different firewall links:
+#   10.0.3.2 via $IF_GW   (gw2's 10.0.3 side)
+#   10.0.2.2 via $IF_SRV  (gw2's 10.0.2 side)
+# Each ping is a separate flow (own state), so the pool choice is made per
+# flow: round-robin must spread the flows over both links, source-hash must
+# keep them on one (same source address -> same bucket).
+set -uo pipefail; cd "$(dirname "$0")"; . ./lib.sh
+
+GW1=$GW2_IP			# 10.0.3.2
+GW2=10.0.2.2
+
+pf0 'insmod /opt/pf/pf.ko 2>/dev/null || insmod /tmp/pf.ko; true'
+pf0 '/opt/pf/pfctl -e; /opt/pf/pfctl -f /dev/null' >/dev/null
+
+IF_GW=$(pf0 "ip route get $GW1 | grep -o 'dev [a-z0-9]*' | cut -d' ' -f2")
+IF_SRV=$(pf0 "ip route get $SRV_IP | grep -o 'dev [a-z0-9]*' | cut -d' ' -f2")
+[ -n "$IF_GW" ] && [ -n "$IF_SRV" ] || { bad "interface resolution"; finish; }
+[ "$IF_GW" != "$IF_SRV" ] || { bad "the two gateways share a link"; finish; }
+ok "pool links: $IF_GW ($GW1) and $IF_SRV ($GW2)"
+
+count_on() {	# count echo requests captured on an interface
+	local n
+	n=$(pf0 "grep -c '$CLI_IP > $SRV_IP' /tmp/pool_$1.td 2>/dev/null; true" | tr -dc '0-9')
+	[ -n "$n" ] || n=0
+	printf '%s' "$n"
+}
+
+run_flows() {	# $1 = ruleset file, four separate ICMP flows
+	pf0 "pkill tcpdump; (tcpdump -ni $IF_GW -c 8 -e icmp > /tmp/pool_gw.td 2>&1 &); (tcpdump -ni $IF_SRV -c 8 -e icmp > /tmp/pool_srv.td 2>&1 &); sleep 1" >/dev/null
+	cli "for i in 1 2 3 4; do ping -c1 -W2 $SRV_IP >/dev/null 2>&1; done"
+	sleep 2
+}
+
+# --- round-robin: the flows must spread over both links ---
+cat > /tmp/g10a.conf <<C
+pass in quick proto icmp from $CLI_IP to $SRV_IP route-to { $GW1, $GW2 } round-robin keep state
+pass out quick keep state
+C
+pfload /tmp/g10a.conf || { bad "rr rule load"; finish; }
+run_flows
+A=$(count_on gw); B=$(count_on srv)
+if [ "$A" -gt 0 ] && [ "$B" -gt 0 ]; then
+	ok "round-robin spread the flows ($A on $IF_GW, $B on $IF_SRV)"
+else
+	bad "round-robin did not spread ($A on $IF_GW, $B on $IF_SRV)"
+fi
+
+# --- source-hash: the same source sticks to one gateway ---
+cat > /tmp/g10b.conf <<C
+pass in quick proto icmp from $CLI_IP to $SRV_IP route-to { $GW1, $GW2 } source-hash keep state
+pass out quick keep state
+C
+pfload /tmp/g10b.conf || { bad "source-hash rule load"; finish; }
+run_flows
+A=$(count_on gw); B=$(count_on srv)
+if [ "$((A + B))" -ge 3 ] && { [ "$A" -eq 0 ] || [ "$B" -eq 0 ]; }; then
+	ok "source-hash pinned the flows to one link ($A/$B)"
+else
+	bad "source-hash spread the flows ($A on $IF_GW, $B on $IF_SRV)"
+fi
+
+pf0 'pkill tcpdump; /opt/pf/pfctl -d' >/dev/null
+finish